Publicado: Mié Ene 12, 2005 12:03 am
lo de los profesores........bueno.......
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/73510e88-6375- ... 511c8.html
ahora GM dice que Saab es muy importante dentro del grupo....
GM Europe chief says Saab remains important brand
Reuters / January 11, 2005
DETROIT -- Saab remains a valuable brand for General Motors, the head of the carmaker's European division said on Tuesday, dismissing a newspaper report that the Swedish unit's future might be in doubt.
"Saab is an important brand for General Motors. It is the only entry premium brand globally, it is one of the few global brands we have, it is almost 100 percent conquest sales for General Motors. So it is of very high importance for us," GM Europe Chairman Fritz Henderson told reporters at the North American International Auto Show.
But he added that GM was looking for ways to improve performance at Saab, in part by expanding its product range.
"Having a two-product global brand is not a recipe for success," Henderson said.
Henderson said GM Europe would announce in the first quarter whether it will build its next-generation mid-size car at a Saab plant in Sweden or at an Opel plant in Germany. He declined to say which plant had the inside track for the job.
He also said GM was looking at ways to make future production more flexible, perhaps by building some European brand cars in North America.
"You do that typically when you look at new products and new architectures. I think over time we will do more of that. I have been asked the question before: do you have to build all Saabs in Sweden? The answer is no. You can build Opels in Sweden, too," Henderson said.
On other subjects, he said GM was reviewing its options for introducing diesel motors to its Cadillac cars in Europe, where diesel is much more popular than in the U.S. market.
"Buying one from BMW is an option. It's not the only one," he said.
He reiterated that GM expected a flat Europe market this year but aimed to boost its market share. GM had around 9.5 percent of the market in 2004, marginally more than in 2003
por mi que se pudran.....
hoy justamente he empezado una optativa de 3 creditos......es de un par de mañanas, sobre invertir en bolsa y demas.....el segundo profesor, que es un broker, nos ha comentado que estaba haciendo un estudio sobre las automovilisticas, comentaba el caso de GM. que si habia tenido 750000 trabajadores, que si bonanza en el siglo XX y su declibe en los 80, con los japoneses que incluso se reian de ellos hasta que vieron como les ganaba cuota, dels 50% que tenian ellos solitos hasta el 50% que han de compartir ahora con FOrd y DC....que si perderia e liderazgo en favor de toyota.....y que cuando en los 80 veian como los japoneses les robaban cuota, decian que solo era por cuestion de coste de mano de obra y poco mas, hasta que decidieron hacer una joint venture para saber como lo hacian, montaron una fabrica conjunta en USA, vieron que no era cuestion de coste de mano de obra sino de mentalidad, de metodo, de forma de hacer, forma de implicar al personal, de tratarlo, de hacer que se sintiera responsable etc etc..... los tios el informe interno que hicieron lo aparcaron y no querian reconocer sus errores...
este auguraba que las acciones de GM a largo plazo acabarian alrededor de los 5 dolares, actualmente se cotizan a 35 aprox.
Saludos
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/73510e88-6375- ... 511c8.html
ahora GM dice que Saab es muy importante dentro del grupo....
GM Europe chief says Saab remains important brand
Reuters / January 11, 2005
DETROIT -- Saab remains a valuable brand for General Motors, the head of the carmaker's European division said on Tuesday, dismissing a newspaper report that the Swedish unit's future might be in doubt.
"Saab is an important brand for General Motors. It is the only entry premium brand globally, it is one of the few global brands we have, it is almost 100 percent conquest sales for General Motors. So it is of very high importance for us," GM Europe Chairman Fritz Henderson told reporters at the North American International Auto Show.
But he added that GM was looking for ways to improve performance at Saab, in part by expanding its product range.
"Having a two-product global brand is not a recipe for success," Henderson said.
Henderson said GM Europe would announce in the first quarter whether it will build its next-generation mid-size car at a Saab plant in Sweden or at an Opel plant in Germany. He declined to say which plant had the inside track for the job.
He also said GM was looking at ways to make future production more flexible, perhaps by building some European brand cars in North America.
"You do that typically when you look at new products and new architectures. I think over time we will do more of that. I have been asked the question before: do you have to build all Saabs in Sweden? The answer is no. You can build Opels in Sweden, too," Henderson said.
On other subjects, he said GM was reviewing its options for introducing diesel motors to its Cadillac cars in Europe, where diesel is much more popular than in the U.S. market.
"Buying one from BMW is an option. It's not the only one," he said.
He reiterated that GM expected a flat Europe market this year but aimed to boost its market share. GM had around 9.5 percent of the market in 2004, marginally more than in 2003
por mi que se pudran.....
hoy justamente he empezado una optativa de 3 creditos......es de un par de mañanas, sobre invertir en bolsa y demas.....el segundo profesor, que es un broker, nos ha comentado que estaba haciendo un estudio sobre las automovilisticas, comentaba el caso de GM. que si habia tenido 750000 trabajadores, que si bonanza en el siglo XX y su declibe en los 80, con los japoneses que incluso se reian de ellos hasta que vieron como les ganaba cuota, dels 50% que tenian ellos solitos hasta el 50% que han de compartir ahora con FOrd y DC....que si perderia e liderazgo en favor de toyota.....y que cuando en los 80 veian como los japoneses les robaban cuota, decian que solo era por cuestion de coste de mano de obra y poco mas, hasta que decidieron hacer una joint venture para saber como lo hacian, montaron una fabrica conjunta en USA, vieron que no era cuestion de coste de mano de obra sino de mentalidad, de metodo, de forma de hacer, forma de implicar al personal, de tratarlo, de hacer que se sintiera responsable etc etc..... los tios el informe interno que hicieron lo aparcaron y no querian reconocer sus errores...
este auguraba que las acciones de GM a largo plazo acabarian alrededor de los 5 dolares, actualmente se cotizan a 35 aprox.
Saludos